RSSI

Why Wi-Spy's RSSI is much lower the the Wireless Card's software indicator's????

the porblem still with me:(
this is show in the Insider 3.1 reports window:
Channel Grade Duty Cycle Average Floor (dBm) Average Peak (dBm)
1 99 (A) 0.6 -115.6 -94.1
2 99 (A) 0.6 -115.7 -92
3 99 (A) 0.6 -115.7 -93.3
4 99 (A) 0.4 -115.8 -98.3
5 100 (A) 0.1 -115.9 -105.4
6 100 (A) 0 -116 -109.8
7 100 (A) 0 -116 -110.2
8 100 (A) 0 -116 -110
9 100 (A) 0 -116 -110.1
10 100 (A) 0 -116 -110
11 100 (A) 0 -116 -109.9
12 100 (A) 0 -116 -110.2
13 100 (A) 0 -116 -110

Here is the byte[] Retrive from the USB WI-SPY Device:
256points>,27,23,27,22,26,25,28,27,24,...

calibration, RSSI vs. topographic view

Just installed Chanalyzer 3.1 beta, looks really good.

Now I know that to try to assign a goodness metric to a signal that intentionally varies over frequency, intensity and time through an unstable medium is to live in a state of sin, but I have to ask:

Flaws to improve

Thanks for Inssider 1.0.12.0317
I’ve been using Vistumbler until now.